You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical considerations, management and treatment of fever of unknown origin caused by urachal cyst: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-1947-8-106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincenzo Bagnara, Salvatore Antoci, Salvatore Bonforte, Giovanna Privitera, Tonia Luca, Sergio Castorina |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 40% |
| Researcher | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 80% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#640
of 3,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,417
of 225,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#12
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,958 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.