↓ Skip to main content

Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of Amomum: insights into evolutionary history and species identification

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of Amomum: insights into evolutionary history and species identification
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, November 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12870-022-03898-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lu Gong, Xiaoxia Ding, Wan Guan, Danchun Zhang, Jing Zhang, Junqi Bai, Wen Xu, Juan Huang, Xiaohui Qiu, Xiasheng Zheng, Danyan Zhang, Shijie Li, Zhihai Huang, He Su

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,114
of 3,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,177
of 440,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#69
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.