↓ Skip to main content

Congenital anomalies during the 2015–2018 Zika virus epidemic: a population-based cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Congenital anomalies during the 2015–2018 Zika virus epidemic: a population-based cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-14490-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Antonio Venancio, Maria Eulina Quilião, Danielli de Almeida Moura, Micael Viana de Azevedo, Sahra de Almeida Metzker, Lisany Krug Mareto, Márcio José de Medeiros, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos-Pinto, Everton Falcão de Oliveira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,658,897
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,408
of 16,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,288
of 429,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#238
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.