You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative accuracy of biomarkers for the prediction of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04223-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heng-Chih Pan, Shao-Yu Yang, Terry Ting-Yu Chiou, Chih-Chung Shiao, Che-Hsiung Wu, Chun-Te Huang, Tsai-Jung Wang, Jui-Yi Chen, Hung-Wei Liao, Sheng-Yin Chen, Tao-Min Huang, Ya-Fei Yang, Hugo You-Hsien Lin, Ming-Jen Chan, Chiao-Yin Sun, Yih-Ting Chen, Yung-Chang Chen, Vin-Cent Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 15 | 18% |
| Colombia | 7 | 8% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 6% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 7% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#686,181
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#460
of 6,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,747
of 437,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.