You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Needs to address clinicians’ moral distress in treating unvaccinated COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00859-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Klitzman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,101,034
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#200
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,164
of 433,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.