↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the quality of feed fats and oils and their effects on pig growth performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the quality of feed fats and oils and their effects on pig growth performance
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40104-015-0005-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald C Shurson, Brian J Kerr, Andrea R Hanson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 30 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 8%
Chemistry 6 6%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 35 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#164
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,674
of 277,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.