↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of reliability and information quality of YouTube videos about root canal treatment after 2016

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of reliability and information quality of YouTube videos about root canal treatment after 2016
Published in
BMC Oral Health, November 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12903-022-02540-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myoung-jun Jung, Min-Seock Seo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#20,576,667
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#1,198
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,979
of 400,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#53
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.