Infarct quantification with cardiovascular magnetic resonance using "standard deviation from remote" is unreliable: validation in multi-centre multi-vendor data

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2022

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 19 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 5 X posts from 5 X users, with an upper bound of 10,524 followers.

RT @journalofCMR: Infarct quantification with cardiovascular magnetic resonance using "standard deviation from remote" is unreliable: valid…

22 Nov 2022

Reply Repost Favourite

The objective of the study was to investigate variability and agreement of the commonly used image processing method “n-SD from remote” and in particular for quantifying myocardial infarction by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) ca…https://t.co/6n6DKPL9rk

22 Nov 2022

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @journalofCMR: Infarct quantification with cardiovascular magnetic resonance using "standard deviation from remote" is unreliable: valid…

22 Nov 2022

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @journalofCMR: Infarct quantification with cardiovascular magnetic resonance using "standard deviation from remote" is unreliable: valid…

22 Nov 2022

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 1 additional X posts.