↓ Skip to main content

Recruiting to Clinical Trials on the Telephone – a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recruiting to Clinical Trials on the Telephone – a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1680-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim Thestrup Foss, Jesper Kjærgaard, Lone Graff Stensballe, Gorm Greisen

Abstract

Informed consent is an essential element of clinical research. Obtaining consent, however, may be challenging. The use of the telephone for giving information and obtaining consent may be practical but little formal research has been done. We examined the use of the telephone for the purpose of informing expectant mothers about The Danish Calmette Study; a randomized clinical trial assessing neonatal Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. Expectant mothers received an invitation letter with a Participant Information Sheet about The Danish Calmette Study, the present trial, and a Consent Form. Two to 4 weeks later we contacted the mothers to discuss potential participation in the present trial. At this initial telephone contact, and after consent from the mothers, we randomized expectant mothers to receive the verbal information about The Danish Calmette Study by telephone, or at a face-to-face consultation. The primary outcome was a communication score, consisting of comprehension of information about The Danish Calmette Study and satisfaction with the information process. The outcome was measured using a questionnaire 2 days after the information was provided, and 2.5 months after the birth of the child. The communication score obtained 2 days after information was given was significantly reduced in the telephone group, effect size -0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI), -1.11 to -0.36). The effect sizes of the subscores were -0.87 (95% CI, -1.25 to -0.49) for satisfaction and -0.22 (95% CI, -0.58 to 0.14) for comprehension. The effect sizes were slightly reduced when assessed 2.5 months after the birth. The communication score was reduced in the telephone group. This was due to a reduction in satisfaction, while no difference in the comprehension could be found in comparison to the control group. This may be ethically acceptable as both groups had high satisfaction scores. ClinicalTrials.gov, registered on 5 October 2015 with trial registration number NCT02570061 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 43 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 47 46%