You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unilateral versus bilateral robot-assisted rehabilitation on arm-trunk control and functions post stroke: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ching-yi Wu, Chieh-ling Yang, Ming-de Chen, Keh-chung Lin, Li-ling Wu |
| Abstract |
BACKGROUND: Although the effects of robot-assisted arm training after stroke are promising, the relative effects of unilateral (URT) vs. bilateral (BRT) robot-assisted arm training remain uncertain. This study compared the effects of URT vs. BRT on upper extremity (UE) control, trunk compensation, and function in patients with chronic stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 60 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 30 | 14% |
| Engineering | 29 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,284,653
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#631
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,333
of 198,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.