↓ Skip to main content

No improvement in socioeconomic inequalities in birthweight and preterm birth over four decades: a population-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No improvement in socioeconomic inequalities in birthweight and preterm birth over four decades: a population-based cohort study
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svetlana V Glinianaia, Rakesh Ghosh, Judith Rankin, Mark S Pearce, Louise Parker, Tanja Pless-Mulloli

Abstract

Birthweight and gestational age are associated with socioeconomic deprivation, but the evidence in relation to temporal changes in these associations is sparse. We investigated changes in the associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and birthweight and gestational age in Newcastle upon Tyne, North of England, during 1961-2000.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 24%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,607,121
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,974
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,765
of 197,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#47
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.