↓ Skip to main content

Psychological and physiological effect in humans of touching plant foliage - using the semantic differential method and cerebral activity as indicators

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 454)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological and physiological effect in humans of touching plant foliage - using the semantic differential method and cerebral activity as indicators
Published in
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1880-6805-32-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuko Koga, Yutaka Iwasaki

Abstract

Numerous studies have reported on the healing powers of plants and nature, but there have not been so many instances of experimental research. In particular, there are very few psychological and physiological studies using tactile stimuli. This study examines the psychological and physiological effects of touching plant foliage by using an evaluation profile of the subjects' impressions and investigating cerebral blood flow.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 135 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Researcher 9 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 45 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Psychology 13 9%
Design 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Engineering 8 6%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 51 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 258. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#144,795
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#9
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#864
of 210,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them