You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Psychological and physiological effect in humans of touching plant foliage - using the semantic differential method and cerebral activity as indicators
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1880-6805-32-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kazuko Koga, Yutaka Iwasaki |
Abstract |
Numerous studies have reported on the healing powers of plants and nature, but there have not been so many instances of experimental research. In particular, there are very few psychological and physiological studies using tactile stimuli. This study examines the psychological and physiological effects of touching plant foliage by using an evaluation profile of the subjects' impressions and investigating cerebral blood flow. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
United States | 2 | 14% |
Nigeria | 1 | 7% |
Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Uruguay | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
Researcher | 9 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 15% |
Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
Psychology | 13 | 10% |
Design | 12 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
Engineering | 7 | 5% |
Other | 32 | 24% |
Unknown | 47 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#549,382
of 24,607,331 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#14
of 298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,660
of 201,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,607,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them