↓ Skip to main content

Clever generation of rich SPARQL queries from annotated relational schema: application to Semantic Web Service creation for biological databases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clever generation of rich SPARQL queries from annotated relational schema: application to Semantic Web Service creation for biological databases
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Wollbrett, Pierre Larmande, Frédéric de Lamotte, Manuel Ruiz

Abstract

In recent years, a large amount of "-omics" data have been produced. However, these data are stored in many different species-specific databases that are managed by different institutes and laboratories. Biologists often need to find and assemble data from disparate sources to perform certain analyses. Searching for these data and assembling them is a time-consuming task. The Semantic Web helps to facilitate interoperability across databases. A common approach involves the development of wrapper systems that map a relational database schema onto existing domain ontologies. However, few attempts have been made to automate the creation of such wrappers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 35%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 33%
Engineering 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2013.
All research outputs
#2,023,218
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#514
of 7,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,317
of 198,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#15
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.