You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relative residential property value as a socio-economic status indicator for health research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-12-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil T Coffee, Tony Lockwood, Graeme Hugo, Catherine Paquet, Natasha J Howard, Mark Daniel |
| Abstract |
Residential property is reported as the most valuable asset people will own and therefore provides the potential to be used as a socio-economic status (SES) measure. Location is generally recognised as the most important determinant of residential property value.Extending the well-established relationship between poor health and socio-economic disadvantage and the role of residential property in the overall wealth of individuals, this study tested the predictive value of the Relative Location Factor (RLF), a SES measure designed to reflect the relationship between location and residential property value, and six cardiometabolic disease risk factors, central obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, reduced high density lipoprotein (HDL), hypertension, impaired fasting glucose, and high low density lipoprotein (LDL). These risk factors were also summed and expressed as a cumulative cardiometabolic risk (CMR) score. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#390
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,388
of 209,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.