↓ Skip to main content

The current position of surgical lung biopsy in the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The current position of surgical lung biopsy in the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Published in
Respiratory Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-14-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riitta Kaarteenaho

Abstract

A new international statement defines usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) which is a histological and radiological form of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) more precisely than previously. In the diagnosis of IPF, either in high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) a UIP pattern must be present or alternatively specific combinations of HRCT and surgical lung biopsy findings can be accepted. In about two third of the cases IPF can be diagnosed by clinical and radiological criteria. Thus surgical lung biopsy is needed in about one third of cases to achieve the ultimate diagnosis, which requires multidisciplinary cooperation. In large clinical trials conducted during the last decade, lung biopsy was performed in about 30--60% of the cases. The most serious complication of lung biopsy is mortality within 30 days after the procedure, with a frequency of about 3--4% reported in most studies. Because of the histological variability, surgical lung biopsy should be taken from a minimum of two lobes. The number of fibroblast foci in surgical lung biopsy has been shown to correlate with survival in several studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 54%
Engineering 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#606
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,118
of 209,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.