↓ Skip to main content

School food policy at Dutch primary schools: room for improvement? Cross-sectional findings from the INPACT study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
School food policy at Dutch primary schools: room for improvement? Cross-sectional findings from the INPACT study
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilke JC van Ansem, Carola TM Schrijvers, Gerda Rodenburg, Albertine J Schuit, Dike van de Mheen

Abstract

Schools can play an important role in the prevention of obesity, e.g. by providing an environment that stimulates healthy eating habits and by developing a food policy to provide such an environment. The effectiveness of a school food policy is affected by the content of the policy, its implementation and its support by parents, teachers and principals. The aim of this study is to detect opportunities to improve the school food policy and/or implementation at Dutch primary schools. Therefore, this study explores the school food policy and investigates schools' (teachers and principals) and parents' opinion on the school food policy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 23%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,035,632
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,091
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,134
of 198,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#181
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.