↓ Skip to main content

Convalescent or standard plasma versus standard of care in the treatment of COVID-19 patients with respiratory impairment: short and long-term effects. A three-arm randomized controlled clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Convalescent or standard plasma versus standard of care in the treatment of COVID-19 patients with respiratory impairment: short and long-term effects. A three-arm randomized controlled clinical trial
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12879-022-07716-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Maria Manzini, Giovannino Ciccone, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Rossana Cavallo, Valeria Ghisetti, Sergio D’Antico, Claudia Galassi, Fabio Saccona, Anna Castiglione, Nadia Birocco, Tiziana Francisci, Huijing Hu, Clara Pecoraro, Franca Danielle, Luciana Labanca, Anna Maria Bordiga, Marco Lorenzi, Giovanni Camisasca, Osvaldo Giachino, Mauro Pagliarino, Piero Ottone, Ilvana Tiziana Donatella Scuvera, Roberto Guaschino, Roberto Freilone, Pierluigi Berti, Fabrizia Pittaluga, Maria Avolio, Cristina Costa, Samuele Raso, Aurora Nucci, Massimo Milan, Alessandra Baffa, Alessandra Russo, Antonella Tornello, Laura Maddalena, Grazia Delios, Fabio Paolo Marletto, Anna Grazia De Micheli, Alessio Mattei, Stefano Baldassano, Francesca Canta, Maria Luisa Russo, Daniele Bergamo, Francesco Vitale, Marco Maria Liccardi, Alessandra Chinaglia, Andrea Calcagno, Marcella Converso, Chiara Aldieri, Valentina Libanore, Ilaria Blangetti, Valentina Benedetti, Barbara Mitola, Gitana Scozzari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 17 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Engineering 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,065,946
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,759
of 8,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,510
of 491,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#40
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.