↓ Skip to main content

Brain extraction from cerebral MRI volume using a hybrid level set based active contour neighborhood model

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain extraction from cerebral MRI volume using a hybrid level set based active contour neighborhood model
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-12-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaofeng Jiang, Weirui Zhang, Yu Wang, Zhen Chen

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extraction of brain tissue from cerebral MRI volume is an important pre-procedure for neuroimage analyses. The authors have developed an accurate and robust brain extraction method using a hybrid level set based active contour neighborhood model. METHODS: The method uses a nonlinear speed function in the hybrid level set model to eliminate boundary leakage. When using the new hybrid level set model an active contour neighborhood model is applied iteratively in the neighborhood of brain boundary. A slice by slice contour initial method is proposed to obtain the neighborhood of the brain boundary. The method was applied to the internet brain MRI data provided by the Internet Brain Segmentation Repository (IBSR). RESULTS: In testing, a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.95+/-0.02 and a mean Hausdorff distance of 12.4+/-4.5 were obtained when performing our method across the IBSR data set (18 x1.5 mm scans). The results obtained using our method were very similar to those produced using manual segmentation and achieved the smallest mean Hausdorff distance on the IBSR data. CONCLUSIONS: An automatic method of brain extraction from cerebral MRI volume was achieved and produced competitively accurate results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Computer Science 3 18%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,686,611
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#529
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,113
of 198,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.