You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Priorities for successful use of artificial intelligence by public health organizations: a literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-14422-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stacey Fisher, Laura C. Rosella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Kenya | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 60 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 65 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,381,644
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,168
of 17,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,883
of 492,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#93
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.