↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of fevers prior to introducing rapid diagnostic tests for malaria in registered drug shops in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of fevers prior to introducing rapid diagnostic tests for malaria in registered drug shops in Uganda
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony K Mbonye, Sham Lal, Bonnie Cundill, Kristian Schultz Hansen, Siân Clarke, Pascal Magnussen

Abstract

Since drug shops play an important role in treatment of fever, introducing rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria at drug shops may have the potential of targeting anti-malarial drugs to those with malaria parasites and improve rational drug use. As part of a cluster randomized trial to examine impact on appropriate treatment of malaria in drug shops in Uganda and adherence to current malaria treatment policy guidelines, a survey was conducted to estimate baseline prevalence of, and factors associated with, appropriate treatment of malaria to enable effective design and implementation of the cluster randomized trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Cambodia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Lecturer 9 7%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,789,649
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#317
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,055
of 178,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#6
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.