You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A mixed methods protocol to implement universal firearm injury risk screening and intervention among youth and adults in emergency departments across a large US health system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-022-00371-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chethan Sathya, Laura Harrison, Katherine Dauber, Sandeep Kapoor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,347,455
of 24,703,227 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#234
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,709
of 476,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,227 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.