↓ Skip to main content

Nocturnality constrains morphological and functional diversity in the eyes of reef fishes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nocturnality constrains morphological and functional diversity in the eyes of reef fishes
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-338
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Schmitz, Peter C Wainwright

Abstract

Ambient light levels are often considered to drive the evolution of eye form and function. Diel activity pattern is the main mechanism controlling the visual environment of teleost reef fish, with day-active (diurnal) fish active in well-illuminated conditions, whereas night-active (nocturnal) fish cope with dim light. Physiological optics predicts several specific evolutionary responses to dim-light vision that should be reflected in visual performance features of the eye.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 154 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 18%
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 55%
Environmental Science 19 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,276,886
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#571
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,704
of 244,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.