↓ Skip to main content

Human behaviour directs household-level exposure to malaria vectors in Bandarban, Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human behaviour directs household-level exposure to malaria vectors in Bandarban, Bangladesh
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12936-022-04375-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew A. Aubourg, Hasan Mohammad Al-Amin, Anoop Sunkara, Sanjna Chetan, April Monroe, Ching Swe Phru, Rashidul Haque, Wasif A. Khan, Allison Hendershot, Mohammad Shafiul Alam, Neil F. Lobo

Abstract

Bangladesh has reduced malaria incidence and mortality by over 75% between 2010 and 2020. Widespread long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) distribution and use is one of the measures responsible for this success. Recalcitrant malaria hotspots within the Chittagong Hill Tracts districts suggest important drivers of malaria risk may remain uncharacterized. Towards understanding how household-level human behaviour impacts exposure to mosquitoes, parallel human landing catches and human behavioural observations were conducted in four households for 6 months (May-October) over the rainy season in the Bandarban District. Analysis quantifies spatiotemporal human behaviour-adjusted exposure to Anopheles with and without LLINs. This small-scale operational study demonstrates that human spatial and temporal presence along with LLIN use drives exposure to Anopheles. Though the four households had both outdoor and indoor exposure, especially in the evening (1800-2000 h) and early morning (0400-0500 h), data points to household-based heterogeneity in malaria exposure even with similar LLIN access. Incorporating human behaviour into exposure estimates can be used to understand the efficacy and limitations of local vector control strategies and identify gaps in protection, as well as where present intervention strategies may be optimized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,100,695
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,158
of 5,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,676
of 439,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#41
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.