↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular fitness associated with cognitive performance in heart failure patients enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular fitness associated with cognitive performance in heart failure patients enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-13-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Garcia, Michael L Alosco, Mary Beth Spitznagel, Ronald Cohen, Naftali Raz, Lawrence Sweet, Richard Josephson, Joel Hughes, Jim Rosneck, Morgan L Oberle, John Gunstad

Abstract

Reduced cognitive function is common in persons with heart failure (HF). Cardiovascular fitness is a known contributor to cognitive function in many patient populations, but has only been linked to cognition based on estimates of fitness in HF. The current study examined the relationship between fitness as measured by metabolic equivalents (METs) from a standardized stress test and cognition in persons with HF, as well as the validity of office-based predictors of fitness in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Professor 7 6%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 23%
Psychology 21 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,326,527
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#76
of 1,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,536
of 175,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.