↓ Skip to main content

Urbanization and the global malaria recession

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urbanization and the global malaria recession
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J Tatem, Peter W Gething, David L Smith, Simon I Hay

Abstract

The past century has seen a significant contraction in the global extent of malaria transmission, resulting in over 50 countries being declared malaria free, and many regions of currently endemic countries eliminating the disease. Moreover, substantial reductions in transmission have been seen since 1900 in those areas that remain endemic today. Recent work showed that this malaria recession was unlikely to have been driven by climatic factors, and that control measures likely played a significant role. It has long been considered, however, that economic development, and particularly urbanization, has also been a causal factor. The urbanization process results in profound socio-economic and landscape changes that reduce malaria transmission, but the magnitude and extent of these effects on global endemicity reductions are poorly understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Brazil 3 1%
Ghana 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 207 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 21%
Researcher 43 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 27 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 19%
Environmental Science 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 51 23%
Unknown 42 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,758,732
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#579
of 5,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,220
of 203,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.