↓ Skip to main content

The impact of operative time on the outcomes of necrotizing soft tissue infections: a multicenter cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of operative time on the outcomes of necrotizing soft tissue infections: a multicenter cohort study
Published in
BMC Surgery, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12893-021-01456-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Femke Nawijn, Mark van Heijl, Jort Keizer, Paul J. van Koperen, Falco Hietbrink

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,734,471
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#634
of 1,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#364,621
of 507,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#25
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,346 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.