You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The true cost of cardiovascular imaging: focusing on downstream, indirect, and environmental costs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-7120-11-10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Larissa Braga, Bruna Vinci, Carlo G Leo, Eugenio Picano |
Abstract |
To develop a more realistic assessment of costs, herein named "true" costs, the extra-cancer from medical radiation, environmental damage from imaging paraphernalia and radioactive wastes must be included as long-term costs from imaging examinations. It is urgent to define the "true" costs across imaging modalities as it interferes on physicians' decision to request an exam and on research projects such as cost-effectiveness analysis. Cardiology is the specialty that most will benefit from the outcome as cardiovascular exams represent almost 30% of the total exams acquired annually worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 46% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,336,865
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#239
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,490
of 197,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.