You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health data privacy through homomorphic encryption and distributed ledger computing: an ethical-legal qualitative expert assessment study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00852-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Scheibner, Marcello Ienca, Effy Vayena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 38% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,581,371
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#571
of 1,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,660
of 442,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.