↓ Skip to main content

A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
325 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock
Published in
Critical Care, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13054-022-04255-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel De Backer, Maurizio Cecconi, Michelle S. Chew, Ludhmila Hajjar, Xavier Monnet, Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón, Marlies Ostermann, Michael R. Pinsky, Jean-Louis Vincent

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 325 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 33 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Unspecified 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#203,649
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#84
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,454
of 492,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.