You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping evidence on management of cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: scoping review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01740-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petmore Zibako, Mbuzeleni Hlongwa, Nomsa Tsikai, Sarah Manyame, Themba G. Ginindza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,412,402
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#214
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,588
of 444,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.