You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Right ventricular energetic biomarkers from 4D Flow CMR are associated with exertional capacity in pulmonary arterial hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-022-00896-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaodan Zhao, Shuang Leng, Ru-San Tan, Ping Chai, Tee Joo Yeo, Jennifer Ann Bryant, Lynette L. S. Teo, Marielle V. Fortier, Wen Ruan, Ting Ting Low, Ching Ching Ong, Shuo Zhang, Rob J. van der Geest, John C. Allen, Marina Hughes, Pankaj Garg, Teng Hong Tan, James W. Yip, Ju Le Tan, Liang Zhong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#14,833,930
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#895
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,904
of 491,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.