You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ameliorative impacts of polymeric and metallic nanoparticles on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: a 2011–2022 review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01718-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maryam Davoudi, Yasaman Jadidi, Kiana Moayedi, Vida Farrokhi, Reza Afrisham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,634,095
of 23,914,787 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#839
of 1,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,850
of 463,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#38
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,575 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.