You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exploration of the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of Luo Tong formula on retinal function in diabetic rats via the “gut microbiota–inflammation–retina” axis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chinese Medicine, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13020-022-00688-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sha Di, Chensi Yao, Liping Qiao, Xiuyang Li, Bing Pang, Jiaran Lin, Jia Wang, Min Li, Xiaolin Tong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 29% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,775,211
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#281
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,375
of 485,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.