You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determining the safety and effectiveness of Tai Chi: a critical overview of 210 systematic reviews of controlled clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-02100-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guo-Yan Yang, Jennifer Hunter, Fan-Long Bu, Wen-Li Hao, Han Zhang, Peter M. Wayne, Jian-Ping Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Professor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 84 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 87 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,722,545
of 23,734,501 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#483
of 2,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,493
of 455,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,734,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.