You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of volatile/inhalational and IV anesthesia in long-term survival of patients with breast cancer: a retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Medical Research, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40001-022-00911-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammad Yasin Karami, Laleh Dehghanpisheh, Ali Karami, Zahra Sabzloun, Hamid Reza Niazkar, Najmeh Mojarad, Ashkan Panah, Abdolrasoul Talei, Sedigheh Tahmasebi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,737,737
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#405
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,059
of 483,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#20
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.