↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Genomic characteristics of two breast malignant phyllodes tumors during pregnancy and lactation identified through whole-exome sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Genomic characteristics of two breast malignant phyllodes tumors during pregnancy and lactation identified through whole-exome sequencing
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13023-022-02583-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ting Lei, Mengjia Shen, Xu Deng, Yongqiang Shi, Yan Peng, Hui Wang, Tongbing Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,789,320
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,185
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,760
of 437,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#61
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.