You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of a Spanish version of the psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS) and an evaluation of its relation with acceptance of pain and mindfulness in sample of persons with fibromyalgia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-62 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Baltasar Rodero, Joao Paulo Pereira, Maria Cruz Pérez-Yus, Benigno Casanueva, Antonio Serrano-Blanco, Maria J Rodrigues da Cunha Ribeiro, Juan V Luciano, Javier Garcia-Campayo |
Abstract |
Psychological flexibility has been suggested as a fundamental process in health. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) is one of the scales employed for assessing psychological inflexibility in pain patients. The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the PIPS and secondly, to compare it to two other psychological constructs, the acceptance of pain and mindfulness scales. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 2% |
Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 232 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 15% |
Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
Researcher | 28 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 9% |
Other | 46 | 19% |
Unknown | 52 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 78 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 29 | 12% |
Unknown | 62 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,751,467
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,218
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,622
of 197,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.