You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol paper: kainic acid excitotoxicity-induced spinal cord injury paraplegia in Sprague–Dawley rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Research, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40659-022-00407-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anam Anjum, Yt Jun Cheah, Muhammad Da’in Yazid, Muhammad Fauzi Daud, Jalilah Idris, Min Hwei Ng, Amaramalar Selvi Naicker, Ohnmar Htwe Ismail, Ramesh Kumar Athi Kumar, Geok Chin Tan, Yin Ping Wong, Mohd Kaisan Mahadi, Yogeswaran Lokanathan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Biological Research
#327
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,297
of 483,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Research
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.