You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inequalities in the use of insecticide-treated nets by pregnant women in Ghana, 2011 and 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04388-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eugene Budu, Joshua Okyere, Felix Mensah, Simon Agongo Azure, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Edward Kwabena Ameyaw, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 12% |
| Design | 4 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,280,545
of 24,940,046 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,403
of 5,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,440
of 479,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#53
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,940,046 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.