↓ Skip to main content

Give It Up For Baby: outcomes and factors influencing uptake of a pilot smoking cessation incentive scheme for pregnant women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Give It Up For Baby: outcomes and factors influencing uptake of a pilot smoking cessation incentive scheme for pregnant women
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Radley, Paul Ballard, Douglas Eadie, Susan MacAskill, Louise Donnelly, David Tappin

Abstract

The use of incentives to promote smoking cessation is a promising technique for increasing the effectiveness of interventions. This study evaluated the smoking cessation outcomes and factors associated with success for pregnant smokers who registered with a pilot incentivised smoking cessation scheme in a Scottish health board area (NHS Tayside).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Student > Postgraduate 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 10 9%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,387,019
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,572
of 15,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,153
of 198,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#117
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.