↓ Skip to main content

miRNA expression profiling of 51 human breast cancer cell lines reveals subtype and driver mutation-specific miRNAs

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
319 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
miRNA expression profiling of 51 human breast cancer cell lines reveals subtype and driver mutation-specific miRNAs
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/bcr3415
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Riaz, Marijn TM van Jaarsveld, Antoinette Hollestelle, Wendy JC Prager-van der Smissen, Anouk AJ Heine, Antonius WM Boersma, Jingjing Liu, Jean Helmijr, Bahar Ozturk, Marcel Smid, Erik A Wiemer, John A Foekens, John WM Martens

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is a genetically and phenotypically complex disease. To understand the role of miRNAs in this molecular complexity, we performed miRNA expression analysis in a cohort of molecularly well-characterized human breast cancer cell lines to identify miRNAs associated with the most common molecular subtypes and the most frequent genetic aberrations. METHODS: Using a microarray carrying LNA™ modified oligonucleotide capture probes), expression levels of 725 human miRNAs were measured in 51 breast cancer cell lines. Differential miRNA expression was explored by unsupervised cluster analysis and was then associated with the molecular subtypes and genetic aberrations commonly present in breast cancer. RESULTS: Unsupervised cluster analysis using the most variably expressed miRNAs divided the 51 breast cancer cell lines into a major and a minor cluster predominantly mirroring the luminal and basal intrinsic subdivision of breast cancer cell lines. One hundred and thirteen miRNAs were differentially expressed between these two main clusters. Forty miRNAs were differentially expressed between basal-like and normal-like/claudin-low cell lines. Within the luminal-group, 39 miRNAs were associated with ERBB2 overexpression and 24 with E-cadherin gene mutations, which are frequent in this subtype of breast cancer cell lines. In contrast, 31 miRNAs were associated with E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation, which, contrary to E-cadherin mutation, is exclusively observed in breast cancer cell lines that are not of luminal origin. Thirty miRNAs were associated with p16INK4 status while only a few miRNAs were associated with BRCA1, PIK3CA/PTEN and TP53 mutation status. Twelve miRNAs were associated with DNA copy number variation of the respective locus. CONCLUSION: Luminal-basal and epithelial-mesenchymal associated miRNAs determine the subdivision of miRNA transcriptome of breast cancer cell lines. Specific sets of miRNAs were associated with ERBB2 overexpression, p16INK4a or E-cadherin mutation or E-cadherin methylation status, which implies that these miRNAs may contribute to the driver role of these genetic aberrations. Additionally, miRNAs, which are located in a genomic region showing recurrent genetic aberrations, may themselves play a driver role in breast carcinogenesis or contribute to a driver gene in their vicinity. In short, our study provides detailed molecular miRNA portraits of breast cancer cell lines, which can be exploited for functional studies of clinically important miRNAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 309 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 25%
Researcher 51 16%
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 63 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 86 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 12%
Computer Science 11 3%
Chemistry 8 3%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 71 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,915,951
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#165
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,462
of 210,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.