↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the impact of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) protocol and Emotional Resilience Skills Training (ERST) among diverse public safety personnel

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the impact of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) protocol and Emotional Resilience Skills Training (ERST) among diverse public safety personnel
Published in
BMC Psychology, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40359-022-00989-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Nicholas Carleton, Michelle McCarron, Gregory P. Krätzig, Shannon Sauer-Zavala, J. Patrick Neary, Lisa M. Lix, Amber J. Fletcher, Ronald D. Camp, Robyn E. Shields, Laleh Jamshidi, Jolan Nisbet, Kirby Q. Maguire, Renée S. MacPhee, Tracie O. Afifi, Nicholas A. Jones, Ronald R. Martin, Jitender Sareen, Alain Brunet, Shadi Beshai, Gregory S. Anderson, Heidi Cramm, Joy C. MacDermid, Rosemary Ricciardelli, Rasheda Rabbani, Taylor A. Teckchandani, Gordon J. G. Asmundson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 18 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,784,995
of 24,776,799 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#490
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,239
of 475,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#23
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,776,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.