You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prediction model for unsuccessful return to work after hospital-based intervention in low back pain patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-140 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ole Kudsk Jensen, Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen, Chris Jensen, Claus Vinther Nielsen |
Abstract |
Many studies on low back pain (LBP) have identified prognostic factors, but prediction models for use in secondary health care are not available. The purpose of this cohort study, based on a randomised clinical study, was to identify risk factors for unsuccessful return to work (U-RTW) in sick-listed LBP patients with or without radiculopathy and to validate a prediction model for U-RTW. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 172 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
Researcher | 24 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
Other | 23 | 13% |
Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 15% |
Psychology | 18 | 10% |
Engineering | 6 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
Other | 23 | 13% |
Unknown | 50 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,925,375
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,369
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,136
of 197,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#37
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.