↓ Skip to main content

On normative judgments and ethics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On normative judgments and ethics
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12910-016-0155-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ognjen Arandjelović

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Design 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,430,043
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#752
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,449
of 416,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.