You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William Capon, Ian B. Hickie, Mathew Varidel, Ante Prodan, Jacob J. Crouse, Joanne S. Carpenter, Shane P. Cross, Alissa Nichles, Natalia Zmicerevska, Adam J. Guastella, Elizabeth M. Scott, Jan Scott, Jai Shah, Frank Iorfino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 19 | 66% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
Scientists | 10 | 34% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 30 | 65% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 6 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 30 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,680,417
of 24,262,436 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,174
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,991
of 454,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,262,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.