You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Design and rationale for the prospective treatment efficacy in IPF using genotype for NAC selection (PRECISIONS) clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12890-022-02281-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anna J. Podolanczuk, John S. Kim, Christopher B. Cooper, Joseph A. Lasky, Susan Murray, Justin M. Oldham, Ganesh Raghu, Kevin R. Flaherty, Cathie Spino, Imre Noth, Fernando J. Martinez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Guinea | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Researcher | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 73% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,025,895
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#99
of 2,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,430
of 485,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.