↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 7,705)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
115 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12859-022-05103-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel M. Portik, C. Titus Brown, N. Tessa Pierce-Ward

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Computer Science 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 37 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#684,216
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#37
of 7,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,683
of 481,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#4
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.