↓ Skip to main content

Motivational interviewing and problem solving treatment to reduce type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk in real life: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivational interviewing and problem solving treatment to reduce type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk in real life: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeroen Lakerveld, Sandra D Bot, Mai J Chinapaw, Maurits W van Tulder, Piet J Kostense, Jacqueline M Dekker, Giel Nijpels

Abstract

Intensive lifestyle interventions in well-controlled settings are effective in lowering the risk of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), but there are still no effective lifestyle interventions for everyday practice. In the Hoorn Prevention Study we aimed to assess the effectiveness of a primary care based lifestyle intervention to reduce the estimated risk of developing T2DM and for CVD mortality, and to motivate changes in lifestyle behaviors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 235 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Researcher 26 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 18%
Psychology 17 7%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 59 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,617,195
of 17,806,415 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#707
of 1,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,433
of 164,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,806,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.