You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Urolithiasis risk: a comparison between healthcare providers and the general population
BMC Health Services Research, July 2016
Ming-Hung Chen, Shih-Feng Weng, Chien-Chin Hsu, Hung-Jung Lin, Shih-Bin Su, Jhi-Joung Wang, How-Ran Guo, Chien-Cheng Huang
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||10||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||8||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||5||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||17||23%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||17||23%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
of 7,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 365,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.