↓ Skip to main content

Clinicopathologic features and abnormal signaling pathways in plasmablastic lymphoma: a multicenter study in China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinicopathologic features and abnormal signaling pathways in plasmablastic lymphoma: a multicenter study in China
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12916-022-02683-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Di Shi, Lin Gao, Xiao-Chun Wan, Jin Li, Tian Tian, Jue Hu, Qun-Ling Zhang, Yi-Fan Su, Yu-Peng Zeng, Zi-Juan Hu, Bao-Hua Yu, Xiao-Qiu Li, Ping Wei, Ji-Wei Li, Xiao-Yan Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#19,643,963
of 25,011,008 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,530
of 3,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,272
of 478,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#123
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,011,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.